/Danny Baker, instantly dismissed – but can social media remarks really be ‘gross misconduct’?

Danny Baker, instantly dismissed – but can social media remarks really be ‘gross misconduct’?

Unless you have been hiding under a rock, you will be aware that comic Danny Banny was fired from his job at the BBC f fired after tweeting a joke about the Duke and Duchess Of Sussex’s son, Archie. Baker apologised after using a picture of an ape in a tweet about the birth and was sacked this morning with the BBC saying the broadcaster’s joke was ‘a serious error of judgement’.

However, can comments on a personal social media account really be classed as gross misconduct, warranting dismissal?  We asked Croner Associate Director Paul Holcroft for this advice, who told us:

The firing of Baker is a reminder to all business owners of the importance of having a social media policy in place.

Social media is an area where employers can dismiss for gross misconduct once they’ve been informed that an offensive remark has been published online. However, this is a difficult area with many challenges surrounding it, and can bring rise to expensive tribunal claims if employees are unfairly dismissed.

The first issue for employers is to determine what online behaviour they’ll class as gross misconduct. This can differ from business to business, depending on, among other factors, the importance of online reputation to the business.

Most rules on online conduct will consider defamation and breaches of confidentiality gross misconduct, but there’s a grey area concerning offensive employee communications that do not relate to the business, but are, nonetheless, posted online.

An indication of the types of comments that are deemed to constitute gross misconduct by the business should be outlined in a social media policy.

Social media policies

The importance of a clear policy outlining rules on social media activity has been highlighted by tribunals in a number of gross misconduct cases.

An Employment Appeal Tribunal ruling found that where a policy prohibited any action which might embarrass the company, this allowed the employer to fairly dismiss the employee for gross misconduct should they be found to have posted such comments on social media.

Simply having a policy may not be enough to prove the employee was aware of their online rights and responsibilities. With this in mind, employers should also ensure they provide training on this issue and receive a signed notice stating that the employee has read and understood the social media policy.

Assessing effects

Tribunals have also highlighted that when determining whether remarks are gross misconduct or not, employers should not only focus on what is actually said, but must look to see if any of the following are adversely affected:

• The business
• Other employees
• Customers

This will require employers to examine each individual breach of the social media policy and determine the likely consequences of each breach separately.

When deciding whether social media remarks can be classed as gross misconduct, other factors that can also be taken in to account include:

• The nature and seriousness of the comments made
• The subject matter of the comments
• The damage to the employer’s reputation
• How and when the comments were made online
• Any mitigating factors

Having a clear and unequivocal social media policy is the best way to protect your business from questions arising from private social media posts by an employee.

Senior Editor Lisa Baker is the owner of Need to See it Publishing Group, providing contract news for business and news sites across the UK. Lisa is an experienced HR writer and commentator, editing HR publications for more than 5 years.